CRRAR SUMMER INSTITUTE
June 8-12, 2020
Multi-Modal Argumentation After 25 Years: A Critical Assessment
Summer Institute Bibliography
Note: All the texts below are supplied in the available compressed file, EXCEPT the two books by Michael Gilbert (1997 & 2015). We hope all participants have access to these texts.
Many of these texts will serve as background reading for the Summer Institute. Where there is direct relevance to one of the sessions, that session is noted after the entry.
Carozza, L. (2007). “Dissent in the midst of emotional territory.” Informal Logic, 27(2), 197-210.
Duran, Claudio & Eva Hamamé (2020) “Diversity in Argumentation Theory.” OSSA. [Thursday]
Duran, Claudio & Eva Hamamé (2019) “Argumentative dialogue and social and political deep disagreement in Chile” in Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon R. Mitchell, Jean H.M. Wagemans (Eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Sic Sat: 284-292.
Gilbert, Michael A. (1994) “Multimodal argumentation” Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Vol 24. No. 2: 159-177.
Vol. 24 No. 2, June 1994 159-177
Gilbert, Michael A. (1994) “Feminism, Argumentation and Coalescence,” Informal Logic XVI.2, Spring.
Gilbert, Michael A. (1995) “Coalescent Argumentation,” Argumentation 9: 837-852.
Gilbert, Michael A. (1997) Coalescent Argumentation. Erlbaum/Routledge. [Thursday Chapters 4 & 6]
Gilbert, Michael A. (2001) “Emotional Messages,” Argumentation 15: 239–249.
Gilbert, Michael A. (2002) “Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation” Argumentation 16: 21–32.
Gilbert, Michael A. (2004) “Emotion, Argumentation and Informal Logic,” Informal Logic Vol. 24, No.3: 245-264
Gilbert, Michael A. (2011) “The Kisceral: Reason and Intuition in Argumentation” Argumentation 25:163–170 [Friday]
Gilbert, Michael A. (2014) Arguing with People. Broadview.
Gilbert, Michael A. (2018) “Multi-modal 2010: Multi-modal Argumentation 20 Years Later,” in Federico Puppo (Ed.) Informal Logic: A ‘Canadian’ Approach to Argument. WSIA.:313-331. [Monday morning]
Godden, David (2003) “Arguing at cross purposes: Discharging the Dialectical Obligations of the Coalescent Model of Argumentation” Argumentation 17: 219-243.
Godden, David (2017) “On the Norms of Visual Argument: A Case for Normative Non-revisionism” Argumentation 31: 395–431.
Groarke, Leo (2015) “Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter?” Argumentation 29: 133-155. [Monday afternoon]
James, William (1902) The Varieties of Religious Experience. [Chapters 16 & 17] [Friday]
Miller, Kathleen (1995) “A Feminist Defense of the Critical-Logical Model” Informal Logic Vol 17 No 3: 337-346